![]() ![]() Fill the active slots, get a little depth. In superflex, running back, which is often a problematic crapshoot to begin with, becomes less important. You only need one, there is ample depth, and if you miss out on the top running backs and wide receivers, you may find yourself chasing a decent flex option all season long. This is not so in superflex formats.įor example, quarterbacks seldom are picked in the first round of standard leagues, and for good reason. Most of us acknowledge draft day is the one we look forward to each year because we welcome the players we will aggressively root for over the next few months, but draft day can also be a bit predictable in standard play. Superflex formats are growing in popularity each year, not only because this format creates more scoring and a greater range in week-to-week results, but because anything goes on draft day. This tips the value to the most important position in the sport. They should be! One of the arguments for fading quarterback in standard formats is, put simply, "you only need one." In superflex, you tend to play two at all times and likely draft three or even four. In a superflex format, he is an early-round draft pick, which feels more realistic.Įverything changes on superflex draft day, and unlike a standard league, in which we can usually spot the managers who jump for the top signal-callers such as Kansas City Chiefs star Patrick Mahomes and the Buffalo Bills' Josh Allen in the early rounds while half the managers wait a good, long while, most quarterbacks are coveted in superflex. The line may differ for everyone, but it always seemed a bit silly seeing Minnesota Vikings QB Kirk Cousins as a free agent in so many standard leagues, since he has been a top-12 QB in ESPN scoring each of the past three seasons, and six of eight. We add scoring, we add strategy and we add interest! How does this change the draft?įading quarterbacks in a standard league is a realistic and successful strategy because there are always more than 10 or 12 of them worthy of starting for your fantasy team. Whenever possible, your superflex player should be a second quarterback, for even in average single-game performances they generally provide more fantasy points on a consistent basis than running backs, wide receivers and tight ends. The superflex slot - in ESPN leagues, it is listed as "OP" (offensive player) - can be a QB, RB, WR or TE, which is different from the regular flex slot, which cannot be a QB. That is what differentiates a superflex format from a standard one. Superflex leagues are becoming all the proverbial rage because there are so many productive quarterbacks in the NFL, it only makes sense to tap into that subset and rely on more than one of them for your fantasy team. It's fine, certainly time-tested and traditional, but perhaps we can do a bit better. Yeah, we all enjoy that one quarterback we don't even have to think about, fill in for the bye week, build the best set of typical flex-eligible options around the QB and there is your fantasy football team. ![]() Nothing against a standard league, but sometimes it can be just so, well, standard. ![]() Quarterback has always been the signature position on the football field, and for fantasy football purposes, there is always tremendous depth at the position in standard leagues. If you limit the number of non-QB starters then you will have better RBs or WRs available to put into the SF spot, making the decision less clear cut and therefore starting just one QB becomes a viable strategy.You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browserįantasy football: How superflex differs from traditional standard leagues If your choice for the superflex spot is a QB or the WR48+ or RB 36+ then the QB is always going to start. ![]() If you add more starting spots the production of your last starter will be lower and your bench will have lower valued/ranked players as replacements. Teams will still play it like a 2QB league, but also value depth of non QBs. However, it would certainly help the value of other positions to have an additional "normal" flex spot (RB or WR or TE) to balance out the values. I am in two SF leagues and the majority of competitive teams start two QBs. If you want to diminish the importance of QBs, you can always add more regular flex spots or other starting spots. Just use a normal scoring system for QBs. The SF system allows a little more flexibility in cases of injuries and bye weeks and roster composition when compared to a 2QB league. It is supposed to mirror a 2 QB league where other positions are mainly ignored for the SF spot. Theone wrote:The purpose of the SF is to encourage the use of QBs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |